My wife is the source of a great deal of wisdom (and sometimes “guidance.”) I have come to recognize that she is much smarter than me in many or most (her father’s emphasis) areas. Last week, Alison sent me the link to an article that purports to answer the question: “What makes for the best family?” This almost ranks up there with “What is the meaning of life?” … it promises the holy grail of parenting.
As I have
suggested in previous posts (see December’s The Turbo Season,) many of us have an
over-developed expectation to see ourselves and our families as more perfect
than can ever be the case. If we became more comfortable with our own quirky
peccadillos and strange familial intra-dynamics, we would likely be much
healthier and happier.
Notwithstanding
that sentiment, the New York Times Op-Ed
piece The Stories That Bind Us provides a
compelling yet surprising answer to the central question that most parents ask
themselves, and sometimes live in fear of the answer. Well-known psychologist Adam Cox undertook a
study of boys around the world who concluded that young men across all cultures
deep down long to two things: to be a good son; and to find meaningful work in
their lives. I would be fascinated to know how this differs, if at all, for
young women. But what about parents? I suspect that the vast majority of
mothers and fathers, on their deathbeds, would want to know more than anything
else, “Was I a good parent?” and “Did I create/foster a good family?” When the
final tally is being made for each of us, these must rank up in the very top
echelon of what are the most important achievements or failures.
So, what does make
for the strongest families? The author of the Op-Ed piece, Bruce Feiler, has
written a book on the subject (The Secrets of Happy Families: How to Improve
Your Morning, Rethink Family Dinner, Fight Smart, Go Out and Play, and Much
More) and draws his conclusions from fascinating research by Emory
University psychologists Dr. Marshall Duke and Dr. Robyn Fivush. Their work was stimulated by an
observation made by Duke’s wife Sara as she worked with children with learning
disabilities: “The ones who know a lot about their families tend to do better
when they face challenges.”
To quote Feiler directly:
“Dr. Duke and Dr. Fivush
asked those questions of four dozen families in the summer of 2001, and taped
several of their dinner table conversations. They then compared the children’s
results to a battery of psychological tests the children had taken, and reached
an overwhelming conclusion. The more children knew about their family’s
history, the stronger their sense of control over their lives, the higher their
self-esteem and the more successfully they believed their families functioned.
The “Do You Know?” scale turned out to be the best single predictor of
children’s emotional health and happiness.”
Later that year, they went on to test this in
the aftermath of the 9/11 with a variety of families, and the theory continued
to hold true.
I certainly didn't expect this conclusion, but on some levels, it makes great sense.
How youth understand themselves can be seen, in
part, through the narrative of their families – that great-granny lost her leg
as a teenager but managed to live a full and successful life; that grandad left
his home to find a better life but had to toil for 50 years in tough labouring jobs
that had nothing to do with his higher education; that aunt Molly still
struggles with addiction like her father; that mom is one of the most famous
business leaders in the country; that great uncle cousin Ernie received an Order
of Canada for his work with the disabled; that my younger sister managed to
overcome breast cancer.
There are three kinds of family narratives:
-
The ascending one – where we “came from nothing” and managed to overcome
hardship to achieve great success
-
The descending one – where we had it all but ran into great tragedy and lost
it
-
The oscillating one – where family lore includes many peaks and valleys and
there are stories of both great achievement and great loss intertwined over the
generations
Not
surprisingly, they find that young people are best served by the oscillating
narrative where they see examples of the good and bad that life brings, but
also understand that they are part of something larger that perseveres and is
resilient over a long period of time. That creates what Duke and Fivush refer
to a strong sense of “intergenerational self.”
I find this
research to be very interesting and it poses a number of questions to us as a
community, as a school, and as parents. I will delve into some of these in my
next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment